Those of us who sell cutting-edge marketing solutions are not always aligned with executives who fund and managers who use new methods and technologies.
We think impacting financial performance and solving business problems should close the deal. It is not always the case. There are all kinds of reasons why people buy or don't buy something that works better. Maybe the person who has to run or implement the test is perceived as barely competent. Or the manager is afraid of looking better than his boss.
The lesson is to find out what matters early in the sales cycle. We need to know not only how to solve business problems but align ourselves with hidden personal and political issues.
In Russia during communism expensive champagne was served during intermission at the ballet. The bartender moved so slowly that not everybody got some. The American visitor asked his Russian friend if servers were always lazy in his country. The Russian said that there was not enough to go around and to save face the theater asked them to go slow.
I read this somewhere and always remember when a potential client engagement makes no sense to me. People always have a reason for doing what they are doing.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
So what does your ad technology company really do?
Marketing technology companies are run by some of the smartest people in the country. However, industry leaders created a matrix of jargon equal to that used at the Pentagon.
A writer said he didn't have time to write a short letter because he was too busy. It is easier to talk industry shorthand than simplify messages for those who don't read AdExchanger.
When sales teams "educate" decision makers about the latest in Demand Side Platforms, programmatic media buying, or dynamic optimization the conversation is over quickly.
The best way to stay out of the technology cubicles is to hire "translators" in sales and marketing roles. Focus on buyer persona and how people talk within their industry. Keep the jargon for those who need it but don't make that the main message.
Companies that do this will stand apart and differentiate same sounding technology to those who control budgets.
A writer said he didn't have time to write a short letter because he was too busy. It is easier to talk industry shorthand than simplify messages for those who don't read AdExchanger.
When sales teams "educate" decision makers about the latest in Demand Side Platforms, programmatic media buying, or dynamic optimization the conversation is over quickly.
The best way to stay out of the technology cubicles is to hire "translators" in sales and marketing roles. Focus on buyer persona and how people talk within their industry. Keep the jargon for those who need it but don't make that the main message.
Companies that do this will stand apart and differentiate same sounding technology to those who control budgets.
Saturday, September 8, 2012
Expanding Business in Key Accounts
The goal of new market development is to engage key accounts that contribute significant revenue. Small projects divert time away from focusing on meaningful business.
My approach is to offer the prospect a more valuable and profitable strategic opportunity, based on the success of a smaller test project that meets an immediate need. When the prospect will not discuss this it is a sign not to waste too much time with them.
It is possible to propose, based on the success of a small project, a contract that allows the prospect to take full advantage of your services. Unless the potential scope does not align with management's idea of a key account the prospect is not important. It does not matter how important or large the company. Have this discussion before scoping the first project.
It takes discipline but do not waste a lot of time or scarce resources. When the prospect tells you that once the work is completed a huge opportunity awaits, know that unless they are willing to spend time talking in detail nothing will ever happen.
My approach is to offer the prospect a more valuable and profitable strategic opportunity, based on the success of a smaller test project that meets an immediate need. When the prospect will not discuss this it is a sign not to waste too much time with them.
It is possible to propose, based on the success of a small project, a contract that allows the prospect to take full advantage of your services. Unless the potential scope does not align with management's idea of a key account the prospect is not important. It does not matter how important or large the company. Have this discussion before scoping the first project.
It takes discipline but do not waste a lot of time or scarce resources. When the prospect tells you that once the work is completed a huge opportunity awaits, know that unless they are willing to spend time talking in detail nothing will ever happen.
How to mine and develop a new market
How to get meetings that lead to sales is one of the most challenging problems companies face today. It is a particular issue for companies that do not yet have a brand name.
The article about cold calls and getting past the gatekeeper prompted a new thoughts:
This has to change as prospects today prefer a different way to engage.
The article about cold calls and getting past the gatekeeper prompted a new thoughts:
- When the message is on target cold emails and calls work
- LinkedIn connections are the best way to get great meetings
- When the addressable market or territory is small connections often don't work
- It is always critical to follow industries, companies, and prospects through social media
- Building a network offline is always important even when the individuals are not prospects
This has to change as prospects today prefer a different way to engage.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)